It has not been easy for Sunderland this season... |
Note: This article was written before (and slightly during and after) Advocaat leaving the post.
It's a well-known trope now: Sunderland's unbreakable cycle.
Start poorly, sack manager, improve, stay up, repeat. It's a constant wheel of
dejection, new lows and 60th minute fan walkouts that doesn't seem to have a
palpable end. How do Sunderland lift themselves out of this endless whirlwind?
It's possible. Perhaps teams haven't settled into a routine
quite as stubbornly as Sunderland in the past, but you can pick out examples of
teams drawing themselves away from their usual character.
Crystal Palace hauled
themselves beyond their usual 'get promoted, instantly get relegated' routine
with the astute appointment of Tony Pulis, followed by Alan Pardew's superb management
of the club. Meanwhile, David Moyes' Everton legacy took them from perennial
strugglers to top-half mainstays. Clubs can change, but it takes a lot of brave
decision-making and a clear plan to achieve.
How can Sunderland do it? My belief is that the following
steps presents the team's best chance of fulfilling their potential.
1. Advocaat should go
And, as I later found out, he did. |
Yeah, I know. I'm starting the list off with a sacking,
which is a major part of the problem already. However, Sunderland won't improve
their hopes of stabilising and establishing a stronger team without turning
over a new leaf, and I just don't believe that Advocaat can be a part of this.
He's a lovely bloke, and has undoubtedly worked hard and
sacrificed a lot to be Sunderland manager. However, it doesn't seem like an
entirely happy situation for him currently, and it looks like quite a big part
of him wants to be somewhere else. Whether that's because his wife doesn't want
to live in Sunderland, or if he doesn't have the passion for the job, or if he
just wishes he had carried through with his plans to retire, something is
holding Advocaat back from truly enjoying the opportunity to manage a big
Premier League club.
Given the scenario that faces Sunderland, and the inevitable
tough days to come, Advocaat's mentality will add an extra weight to the
already sinking ship. Although he was rightly commended for his decision to
stay into the start of this season, that shouldn't obscure the truth that he
doesn't seem to be the right man for the job.
2. Pick the right man
Could Nigel Pearson be Sunderland's solution? |
This would seem like an obvious step, but Sunderland have
often been at the disadvantage of choosing their managers in March, limiting
the pool of potential prospects. The last time they bucked this trend was
following the 2008-2009 season: Sunderland appointed Ricky Sbragia as caretaker
manager after sacking Roy Keane, meaning they could get Steve Bruce at the end
of the season.
If they do let Advocaat go, Sunderland's board should have a
very clear vision of who would be the best man to take over. There needs to be
patience here also - if it means appointing an interim manager until the end of
the season and waiting for the perfect candidate to become available, then so
be it.
It's easy enough to talk about picking the right man, but
Sunderland can't be accused of not trying different tactics when it comes to
appointing managers. They've gone for Premier League experience (Steve Bruce,
Martin O'Neill), passion (Paolo Di Canio), lower-league rising stars (Gus
Poyet) and international pedigree (Dick Advocaat). However, all of these
managers came with certain baggage which held them back, and all were given, at
most, two years to get it right.
It's difficult to decide what Sunderland needs the most, but
I would argue that passion needs to be a part of the skillset. Recently
theories have been bandied around that suggests Northern teams are at an
inherent disadvantage for socio-economic reasons, meaning that top players find
the idea of living in such areas undesirable. Whether or not this is as
significant as has been suggested, Sunderland will have to accept the changing
landscape of football and understand that they need to do more to convince
quality players to move up North. A passionate enigma of a manager could be a
part of winning such a battle.
Nigel Pearson has been mentioned, and this could be a
reasonable shout. No-one can deny the man's passion (often straying into the
comical), and he has the experience of hauling a seemingly desperate team out
of the relegation places. Pearson's success in building a strong Leicester team
capable of staying in the Premier League shows he has an eye for a good player,
and the conviction of his own beliefs to keep faith in his side when results
went against him.
For the sake of argument, let's say Pearson is chosen and
move onto step three.
3. Insist on a squad overhaul
Lee Cattermole - a relic from six managers ago... |
The current Sunderland squad is made up of broken bits from
a variety previous regimes. It's as if someone has taken pieces from five
different jigsaw puzzles and tried to glue them together - the result is about
as pretty as Sunderland's football. There is little cohesion in the side, and
every new manager has had to work with the (often failed) judgements of his
predecessor.
Sunderland's board should insist that a new manager
completely overhauls the current squad. It is impossible to instil a set of
philosophies and tactical nuances effectively when working with a team that
isn't yours, and ultimately Sunderland will need a manager to do this for there
to be any hope of progression. While a huge changeover may be costly, it pays
dividends well beyond a constant patchwork job of adding new players who don't
really fit the rest of the squad.
With Pearson hypothetically appointed, he should use the
rest of the season to assess the players within his own playing style. It may
be that he can put together a starting eleven who function well in his system,
or it may be that he only chooses to keep the goalkeeper. Either way, the most
important thing is that the board trust the way he operates, and fully backs
any transfers he instigates.
4. Don't be afraid to get relegated
Sunderland's last Championship season wasn't so bad... |
It seems that the Sunderland board's biggest fear is to get
relegated to the Championship, and every decision made is a scrabbling attempt
to marginally keep Sunderland above the dotted line. This is the ultimate in
short-term thinking, and relegation should be considered as a probable step in
the rebuilding process - a step that is not without its benefits. In our
ever-growing hypothetical, let's suggest that Pearson is appointed, he starts
to put his philosophy into practice but, as a result, the team is relegated.
Normally, Pearson would be sacked at this point, but the
board must back their man. Relegation is not the end of the world, especially
with the sincere belief that the manager will eventually lead the club to
success. Relegation is a huge opportunity to regroup, build a new team and get
fans motivated again.
Away from the pressures of the Premier League, it is far
easier for a club to take a few risks with bringing in new talent. It doesn't
matter if a signing flops or if young players are struggling to find their feet
- the sneering punditry and media criticisms of the manager's judgement are
turned down to a barely audible volume once a club is out of the top tier. Time
in the Championship would give Pearson an opportunity to play some of the
youngsters, sign lower-league talents he feels have strong potential and find
his perfect eleven.
And yes, I did say it will get fans motivated again. While
Sunderland supporters are still admirably keeping attendances high (42,000
yesterday against West Ham), I feel like I could create a three-hour montage of
all the footage where fans leave the game early. A spell in the Championship
may mean attendances dip initially, but when the winning starts it really
doesn't matter which league you're in. People love to go and watch their team
win, and a club the size of Sunderland will, with the right manager,
undoubtedly hover close to the top spot.
5. Let the manager build a dynasty
Perhaps it was the hope that Roy Keane would do the same. |
To break the cycle, Sunderland will have to do things
differently. They have tried all sorts of different managers, but the one thing
they haven't attempted recently is letting one build their own dynasty at the
club. It is easy to make knee-jerk decisions when results aren't going well,
but the knees of the Sunderland board have been doing riverdance for far too
long.
With our hypothetical Pearson-led Sunderland bouncing back into
the top flight, they now have a squad which is suited to his liking. Perhaps
they struggle in that first season, and it looks like they're heading for the
exit once more. Do Sunderland get rid of him then? Do they get a new manager in
to keep the team in the Premier League? After all, they worked so hard to get
there, surely one sacking to boost the club's chances won't hurt.
But of course, the answer is they shouldn't. It does take
time for a good manager to set everything the right way, and there will always
be setbacks. Judgement should always fall back to that first moment, where the
board chose the manager. What did they choose him for? What were their
ambitions? What did they see occurring? What's the plan? If the board were
truly certain when they made that decision, it should be clear. Making mistakes
as a great manager often isn't just one or two games, sometimes it's entire seasons.
But if the board knows it has the right manager, then the only thing they have
to do is stick to their conviction.
It begins
In the process of writing this, Advocaat has left
Sunderland. Pearson has already been rumoured as a possible replacement, so
while this might seem like the continuation of that oh-so-predictable
Sunderland cycle, maybe it's the moment where the wheel falls off of the
choking, spluttering car, and flies off down the road into new pastures. Maybe
we are beginning on this new cycle, and perhaps in a few seasons will see a
Sunderland brimming with momentum, confidence and the ability to finally fulfil
the huge potential that has always been threatened.
No comments:
Post a Comment